Agenda and draft minutes

Members are asked to declare any disclosable pecuniary or affected interests and the nature of that interest, including the existence and nature of the party whip, in respect of any matter to be considered at this meeting. Any Member with a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest in a matter should withdraw from the meeting when the matter is under consideration and should notify the Democratic Services Officer in attendance that they are withdrawing as they have such an interest. If the Disclosable Pecuniary Interest is not entered on the register of Members interests the Monitoring Officer must be notified of the interest within 28 days. Any Member with an Affected Interest in a matter must disclose the interest to the meeting. There is no requirement to withdraw from the meeting when the interest is only an affected interest, but the Monitoring Officer should be notified of the interest, if not previously notified of it, within 28 days of the meeting.

There were no declarations of interest made.

To consider possible ideas for future scrutiny reviews to be undertaken by the Panel during their administration.

The Chair of the Education, Skills and Growth Panel, Councillor Cath Thompson, explained to Panel members that the Overview & Scrutiny (O&S) Commission had to create a four-year work plan. In order to do this each O&S Panel was requested to suggest issues they would like to scrutinise so these could be discussed, and agreed formally, at an O&S Commission meeting on 29 February. The Chair also explained she had met with the Executive Director: People, Grainne Siggins, and the Vice Chair of the Panel, Councillor Jodie Watts on 17 January to discuss emerging issues and help inform the meeting.

The Panel had a robust discussion about issues they would like to scrutinise during their term of administration which included:

·       Transition from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) to Adult and Older Mental Health Services, or transition from children’s social care to adult social services, to ensure children were not ‘getting lost’ at this point due to a reduction in legal duties to provide services.

·       Concern was raised about Children Not in Education or Employment (NEET) and their vulnerability, but it was recognised this group of children would not be classed as vulnerable according to the legislative definition.

·       Given a recommendation at full Council for Bracknell Forest Council to become part of the Safety Valve Programme, and the Council’s focus on Special Educational Needs (SEND), it was suggested the Panel keep a close eye on this area. Discussions included looking at access to services, CAMHS and SEND, the success and impact of the Safety Valve Programme, following one or two anonymised cases from beginning of the programme to end to ensure they were completed within the 20-week timescale, analysing good quality data, tracking the SEND Action Plan, and keeping up to date with the SEND school provision being built in the borough. All Panel members agreed it was an area which required challenge and the Chair informed Panel members the Executive Director: People had agreed to provide her with an update quarterly on this area which would be fed back regularly to O&S Commission members. It was also pointed out that the SEND team were receiving a lot of scrutiny already and they wanted to prevent undue pressure on officers working to deliver on this programme of change, as well as preventing duplication of resources. The majority of Panel members agreed the quarterly update approach would be best and they would see if anything required further scrutiny following those updates.

·       Recruitment and Retention of staff across the whole Council was suggested as Bracknell, like many local authorities, were struggling to fill gaps in some service areas. Some Panel members thought this review may need to be more focused and it was suggested the review looked at specific service areas, such as case workers in the SEND team, rather than the whole Council.

·       It was suggested scrutinising the Youth Offending Services, but Panel members thought this would be difficult currently.

·       The impact of school academisation on the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 2.