The Commission considered the report from
the Environment and Communities Panel which had met to gain a
stronger understanding of the Highways and Transport Capital
Programme, particularly in areas such as funding, processes and
prioritisation. The meeting was carried out in preparation for the
review of the budget by discussing the programme with Bracknell
Forest Council’s Executive Director: Place, Planning and
Regeneration and the Assistant Director: Highways and
Transport.
There were seven key findings from the
Panel as set out in the report. There were no recommendations
arising from the meeting as the Panel were content that the
methodology for identifying areas of concerns was sound and
acknowledged that the funding received from central government was
ringfenced. The Panel recognised that whilst highway maintenance
was considered underfunded, the pressures within the Council meant
that it was not possible to increase this element of the
budget.
Arising from the discussion the
following points were made:
- It was observed that
the quality of the road network appeared to be deteriorating and
the cost of rebuilding roads was higher than maintaining them. It
was explained that the maintenance programme was prioritised on a
risk basis therefore some roads or structures required
rebuilding but wherever possible the life of roads would be
extended using techniques such as grip fibre programme to recoat
the roads.
- A new Highways Asset
Maintenance Plan was being developed and based on the funding
available, intervention works or rebuilding would be considered for
the roads and structures identified as a priority. This was
reviewed annually.
- Ringway was the
Council’s highways contractor and working with them the
Council looked to deliver innovation projects such as using greener
products which were better for the environment. It was explained
that such technologies needed to be tested over time to ensure that
they were durable for the lifespan of the repair
required.
- ACTION: Executive
Director: Place, Planning and Regeneration to update the Commission
on whether new materials containing recycled plastic were being
used within the programme
- Potholes could be
reported through Customer Services and their repair would then be
scheduled on a priority basis. The Council uses a system called
‘Scanner’ to survey the roads to assess if there were
failings in the road structure, cracks and this information was
used to build the profile of the network.
- ACTION: In
response to a query regarding new pothole filling technology the
Executive Director: Place, Planning and Regeneration would clarify
the current method for filling potholes used by the
contractors
- It was confirmed that
local roads within estates were a lower priority from a safety and
risk perspective due to the lower volume of traffic using those
roads. The grip fibre programme which is a top dressing to bring
roads up to a reasonable level and extend the life of the road is a
regular feature in the Council’s annual
programme.
- A mixture of
approaches was used to fund the improvement and maintain cycle
lanes. Through Section 106 monies the cycle network was extended to
fix connections whilst some government funding was received for
alternative modes of transport.
- The existing cycle
network would not require modifications for escooter use but
further thought may be required on the etiquette of using
them.
The Commission Chair thanked
the Panel for their input to the session, for helping to produce
the informative paper which would form an important part of
understanding the budget consultation.
The Commission noted the
Panel’s Highways and Transport Capital Programme
report.