Agenda and draft minutes

Governance & Audit Committee - Wednesday, 21 June 2023 7.30 pm

Venue: Council Chamber - Time Square, Market Street, Bracknell, RG12 1JD. View directions

Contact: Lizzie Rich  01344 352253

Link: This meeting will be a Hybrid meeting

Media

Items
No. Item

4.

Declarations of Interest

Members are asked to declare any disclosable pecuniary or affected interests in respect of any matter to be considered at this meeting.

 

Any Member with a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest in a matter should withdraw from the meeting when the matter is under consideration and should notify the Democratic Services Officer in attendance that they are withdrawing as they have such an interest. If the Disclosable Pecuniary Interest is not entered on the register of Members interests the Monitoring Officer must be notified of the interest within 28 days.

 

Any Member with an affected Interest in a matter must disclose the interest to the meeting.  There is no requirement to withdraw from the meeting when the interest is only an affected interest, but the Monitoring Officer should be notified of the interest, if not previously notified of it, within 28 days of the meeting.

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest.

5.

Minutes of previous meeting pdf icon PDF 130 KB

To approve as a correct record the minutes of the meetings of the Committee held on 22 March 2023 and the Annual Meeting on 24 May 2023.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting of the committee held on the 22 March 2023 and 24 May 2023 (Annual Meeting) be approved as a correct record.

6.

Urgent Items of Business

Any other items which, pursuant to Section 100B(4)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972, the Chairman decides are urgent.

Minutes:

There were no urgent items of business.

7.

External Audit: Audit Progress Report pdf icon PDF 56 KB

To advise Members of the progress in completing the audit of the 2020/21 and 2021/22 financial statements.

Minutes:

Stuart McKellar, Borough Treasurer introduced Andrew Brittain, Ernst & Young to present the External Audit report.

 

Ernst & Young were responsible for the external audit of Bracknell Forest Council’s accounts. Andrew explained that delays to audit activity had been caused by a delay to the completion of the Berkshire Local Government Pension Fund audit which came under the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead audit process with Deloitte. The letter of assurance for the 2020/21 audit of the pension fund had now been received, and so the 2020/21 audit had now been completed.

 

The 2021/22 audit would be completed over the summer months, and it was hoped that any outstanding issues on the account would be brought to the September 2023 Committee meeting. Once the 2021/22 audit was complete, the 2022/23 audit would begin with an interim visit in March 2023. It was noted that a number of Councils currently had open audits, and the Government was looking into ways to accelerate the process.

 

Arising from questions, the following points were noted:

·        While most Councils had met audit deadlines in previous years, the number of Councils able to meet audit deadlines had declined rapidly. The issue was a national one, and not specific to Bracknell Forest.

·        An audit result report would be brought to the July 2023 Committee meeting, which would include a conclusion on financial statements, an audit opinion and a value for money conclusion which considered whether economy of effectiveness was being achieved through the Council’s third-party arrangements.

 

8.

Internal Audit Annual Assurance Report 2022/23 pdf icon PDF 388 KB

To deliver an annual internal audit opinion. This is timed to inform review of the Annual Governance Statement (AGS).

 

Minutes:

Sally Hendrick, Head of Audit and Risk Management presented the Internal Audit Annual Assurance report which was to note.

 

The report included an opinion for the year of partial assurance, based on work undertaken by internal auditors across 53 audits conducted throughout the year. The opinion was based on some areas of weakness which had been drawn out through audits conducted during the year. However, it was noted that the number of partial assurance opinions had declined in number compared to the previous year. Sally commented that the partial assurance was based on the number of recommendations which had not been carried out or put in place.

 

It was noted that a number of partial assurance opinions in this year’s report related to schools, which were autonomous bodies separate to the Council for this purpose.

 

To keep track of recommendations, a recommendation tracker had been implemented to assist management in keeping track of progress on recommendations. It was hoped that this would improve the rate of implementation and action following internal audits.

 

The Council was required to conduct a self-assessment every year under the Public Sector Internal Audit Standards, and to hold an external review of its internal audit service every 5 years. The last external audit had been conducted in March 2022, with very few points for improvement drawn out. One point arising from this external review had been a suggestion to take on apprentices in a ‘grown your own’ approach to address recruitment difficulties. Two apprentices had been in place in the team for 6 months and were progressing well, however it was noted that it would take some time for these officers to be fully trained.

 

Sally drew attention to work around counter-fraud and benefits abuse. Internal audit officers had worked together with the Department for Work and Pensions on benefits cases this year and had also done proactive work on Blue Badge claimants.

 

In response to questions, the following points were noted:

·        It was speculated that recommendations had not been followed up or implemented due to staffing pressures and turnovers across the Council. Auditors were keen to inform departments not to sign up to actions which could not be delivered.

·        Members requested an additional column on the recommendation tracker to take account of the recommendations which were outstanding or not yet started. Any critical recommendations would have a formal follow up separately to the recommendation tracker. 

·        The external assessment had advised officers to make better use of data analytics to evaluate risks and weaknesses. There had been a delay to this work due to the vacant Principal Auditor post, which was about to go out to advert. Once the post was filled, all audit staff would be trained in data analytics and data interrogation.

·        The recruitment market for auditors was challenging, and applicants were often at the end of their careers. Post-COVID, there had been a high turnover of auditor posts both internally and externally.

·        The internal audit team used contractors to cover some posts, but  ...  view the full minutes text for item 8.