Minutes:
Safeguarding Education Annual Report
Debbie Smith presented the Safeguard Education Annual Report for the academic year 2015-16.
Debbie commented that there were three primary schools of concern with regard to the number of fixed period exclusions. The LSCB was facilitating a current audit on the six primary school children who had received permanent exclusions.
A Local Authority officer attended all Governors Disciplinary Committees (GDC) for permanent exclusions, and wherever possible for fixed period exclusions. There had not been any Independent Review Panels in the academic year 2015-16, but one was scheduled for an academy school who had decided not to have Local Authority representation.
There had been a total of 45 students referred to the Fair Access Panel, which had resulted in 40 managed moves and 35 reviews. There were no concerns around support for Looked After Children.
The Safeguarding Visits to schools had been reshaped to form a one day visit to schools to assess the critical safeguarding areas informed by the annual S.11 audit process.
Resulting from discussion, the following points were noted:
Elective Home Education Annual Report
Ian Dixon presented the Elective Home Education (EHE) Annual Report for the academic year 2015-16.
Ian commented that as there was no legislative right to check on families who choose home education,. Parents were encouraged to engage with the Local Authority, and where possible, visits were conducted. Families were not obligated to give a reason for EHE, and in Bracknell Forest there were an increasing number of families home educating.
In response to questions, the following points were noted:
Children Missing Education (CME)
Ian
Dixon presented the Children Missing Education Annual Report for
the academic year 2015/16.
Ian reported that the challenge by the LSCB to previous concerns resulted in a review of all children identified as CME but that no current safeguarding concerns had been identified for that cohort of children. CME processes and the interface with missing children have improved as a result -the referral process for CME began with schools making an enquiry to the Local Authority, which would be investigated by the CME team who often found the child at this point. In the absence of any other concerns, if after 30 days the child had not been found, a referral would be made to the MASH. Any child with a current or historic social care referral would be referred immediately to Children’s Social Care once identified as CME.
The CME Placement Panel was a multi-agency panel which met monthly to assess CME cases. Lillian Dickinson (CSE lead) acted as link social worker and sat on both the CME Placement Panel and SEMRAC. Ian commented on inconsistent attendance at Panel meetings from Health colleagues, and it was responded that Health attendance should only be required on a case by case basis. It was suggested that the Terms of Reference be updated to reflect this. (Action: Ian Dixon)Following from discussion, the following points were noted: