Agenda and minutes

Venue: Council Chamber, Fourth Floor, Easthampstead House, Bracknell

Contact: Greg O'Brien  01344 352044

Items
No. Item

23.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 161 KB

To approve as a correct record the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 18 June 2015.

Minutes:

RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 18 June 2015 be approved as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

24.

Declarations of Interest

Any Member with a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest or an Affected Interest in a matter should withdraw from the meeting when the matter is under consideration and should notify the Democratic Services Officer in attendance that they are withdrawing as they have such an interest. If the Interest is not entered on the register of Members interests the Monitoring Officer must be notified of the interest within 28 days.

Minutes:

Councillor Mrs Angell declared a disclosable pecuniary interest in Agenda item no. 7 [Application No 15/00216/FUL – Oakwood, Waterloo Road, Wokingham, RG40 3DA] as a contributor to the proposed development from her initiative funding.

Councillor Angell declared an affected interest in Agenda item no. 7 [Application No 15/00216/FUL – Oakwood, Waterloo Road, Wokingham, RG40 3DA] by virtue of the interest of his spouse.

Councillor Heydon declared a disclosable pecuniary interest in Agenda item no. 7 [Application No 15/00216/FUL – Oakwood, Waterloo Road, Wokingham, RG40 3DA] as a contributor to the proposed development from his initiative funding.

Councillor Mrs Mattick declared a non-pecuniary interest in Agenda item no. 9 [Application no. 15/00248/FUL – 9 Vickers Row, Bracknell, RG12 9PQ] which did not disable her from taking part in consideration of the item but precluded her from voting.

Councillor Mrs Hayes declared an interest in Agenda item no. 12 [ Application No 15/00416/T – Locks Ride Playing Fields, Forest Road, Winkfield Row, Bracknell] as a member of Winkfield Parish Council.

Councillor Mrs Phillips declared an interest in Agenda item no. 12 [ Application No 15/00416/T – Locks Ride Playing Fields, Forest Road, Winkfield Row, Bracknell] as a member of Winkfield Parish Council.

Councillor Ms Gaw declared an interest in Agenda item no. 12 [ Application No 15/00416/T – Locks Ride Playing Fields, Forest Road, Winkfield Row, Bracknell] as a member of Winkfield Parish Council.

Councillor Skinner declared an Affected Interest in Agenda Item no. 13 [Application 15/00436/3 – Street Record, Pendlebury, Bracknell] since he lived in close proximity to the site of this application.

25.

Urgent Items of Business

Any other items which, pursuant to Section 100B(4)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972, the Chairman decides are urgent.

Minutes:

There were no items of urgent business.

26.

PS Application No 14/01333/OUT - Land To The West Of Locks Ride, Locks Ride, Ascot pdf icon PDF 298 KB

Outline application for a residential development of up to 88 dwellings with vehicular access from Locks Ride, open space and associated works.

(All matters reserved apart from access)

Minutes:

Outline application for a residential development of up to 88 dwellings with vehicular access from Locks Ride, open space and associated works.

(All matters reserved apart from access)

 

A site visit had been held on Saturday 11 July which had been attended by Councillors Angell, Birch, Brossard, Dudley, Finnie, Hill, Mrs Ingham, Mrs Mattick, Mrs McKenzie, Mrs McKenzie-Boyle, Ms Peacey, Mrs Phillips, Thompson and Turrell.

 

The Committee noted:

 

  • The supplementary report of the Head of Planning tabled at the meeting.
  • The observations of Winkfield Parish Council which had strongly objected to the application for the following reasons:

1. This site is not in BFC's approved and adopted SADPD and therefore should be given no further consideration. It is incredulous that developers are given the opportunity to challenge a Government Planning Inspector's decision.

2. The local infrastructure, doctors, schools, highways, public transport will NOT support an additional 88 dwellings.

3. The development is totally out of character with the area.

4. Local utility infrastructure (water, drainage, sewage) is already stretched and under great strain - adding 88 more homes will cause it to fail.

  • A petition containing 222 signatories opposing use of the land for housing development.
  • The comments of the Society for the protection of Ascot and Environs objecting to the proposal.
  • 123 individual objections to the proposal on a substantial number of reasons, grouped around the following main headings:

-       principle of development and impact on character of the area

-       transport

-       services and infrastructure

-       impact on living conditions of local residents

-       trees and wildlife

  • Thames Valley Chamber of Commerce Group and 2no. individuals had submitted representations in support of the application.
  • A revised Flood Risk Assessment/Drainage Strategy had been received and that in the light of this, and the advice of the Council's Senior Engineer (SuDS and Highway Adoption), a reason for refusal relating to sustainable drainage was withdrawn.

 

The criteria for public speaking had been met in respect of this application and the Committee was addressed by the registered speaker Mrs Ruth Lyes, who represented her objections to the proposed development.

 

RESOLVED that the application be REFUSED for the following reason(s):-

 

01.    The proposed development would be poorly located with regard to services and facilities with inadequate accessibility to non-car borne modes of transport which would leave future residents with no real choice about how they travel.  Furthermore it would detract from the character and appearance of the countryside.  The proposal is therefore not sustainable development and the application is contrary to Core Strategy Development Plan Document Policies CS1, CS7 and CS23, Bracknell Forest Borough Local Plan Policy EN20, the Character Areas Assessment Supplementary Planning Document and the NPPF.

 

02.    It has not been demonstrated that the impact of the proposed development on the local road network can be fully mitigated.  As it could adversely affect road safety and the flow of traffic the proposal is therefore contrary to Policy CS23 of the Core Strategy Development Plan Document.

 

03.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 26.

27.

Application No 15/00203/FUL - 41 Ludlow, Bracknell, RG12 7BZ pdf icon PDF 91 KB

Proposed single storey ground floor extension, conversion of garage into habitable accommodation.

Minutes:

Proposed single storey ground floor extension, conversion of garage into habitable accommodation.

 

The Committee noted:

 

  • The supplementary report of the Head of Planning tabled at the meeting.
  • An objection from Bracknell Town Council on the grounds that the loss of parking will have a negative effect on the area.

 

RESOLVED that the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

 

01.     The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.   

         

02.     The development hereby permitted shall be carried out only in accordance with the following approved plans:       

          121/AS/12 F 'Proposed Ground Floor Plan'       

          121/AS/13 B 'Proposed First Floor Plan'

          121/AS/14 C 'Proposed Elevations'        

         

03.       The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the garage conversion and extension hereby permitted shall be similar in appearance to those of the existing building.   

28.

Application No 15/00216/FUL - Oakwood, Waterloo Road, Wokingham, RG40 3DA pdf icon PDF 107 KB

Erection of a detached building to be used as an Indoor Climbing Centre, the creation of an access for cycles and pedestrians directly opposite the end of the cycle path on Waterloo Road and the creation of 50no. parking spaces within the north-east corner of the site.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Erection of a detached building to be used as an Indoor Climbing Centre, the creation of an access for cycles and pedestrians directly opposite the end of the cycle path on Waterloo Road and the creation of 50no. parking spaces within the north-east corner of the site.

 

A site visit had been held on Saturday 11 July which had been attended by Councillors Angell, Birch, Brossard, Dudley, Finnie, Hill, Mrs Ingham, Mrs Mattick, Mrs McKenzie, Mrs McKenzie-Boyle, Ms Peacey, Mrs Phillips, Thompson and Turrell.

 

The Committee noted:

 

  • The supplementary report of the Head of Planning tabled at the meeting.
  • The comments of Bracknell Town Council who would like to be assured that the building will be in keeping with the area and its use restricted to that of an indoor climbing centre.  No further lighting should be added to the site to ensure the amenity of the area is not compromised.
  • Letters of support from the MP for Bracknell and four local schools.
  • Two letters of objection expressing the following concerns:

- The proposal represents an overdevelopment of the site that is out of keeping with the character and appearance of the area when viewed from outside the site.

- Inappropriate development on green belt land.

- The proposal is a commercial activity and should not be given any special consideration.

 

Following discussion, a motion to refuse the application as recommended in the officer report was put to the vote.  As there was an equal number of votes for and against, the motion was defeated on the casting vote of the Chairman.

 

An alternative motion, as set out on a sheet tabled at the meeting, proposing conditional permission, was moved and seconded.  Arising from discussion, amendments were accepted to the effect that the standard drainage condition be added together with a further condition detailing the operational hours as set out in the information submitted by the applicant be added.  The alternative motion was put to the vote and was carried.

 

The Committee took the view that given the existing use of the site as a Youth Activity Centre, the proposed development comprised a complementary use that would not adversely affect the residential amenity of the area or the function or character of the countryside.  Provision within the proposals for cycle route and pedestrian access, the proposed use by schools and youth groups where travel by minibus or car-sharing would be utilised, together with the additional parking proposed sought to address the question of sustainable development.  Further details of adequate drainage arrangements for the development would be covered by imposition of a suitable condition.  In the Committee’s view these were material considerations which outweighed the proposal’s conflict with the Development Plan

 

RESOLVED that planning application 15/00216/FUL be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:

 

01.    The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

 

02.    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out only in accordance with the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 28.

29.

Application No 15/00248/FUL - Land Adjacent To 23 Darwall Drive, Ascot, SL5 8NB pdf icon PDF 131 KB

Erection of a detached bungalow  on land adjacent to 23 Darwall Drive with parking to the rear following demolition of existing garage.

Minutes:

Erection of a detached bungalow on land adjacent to 23 Darwall Drive with parking to the rear following demolition of existing garage

 

A site visit had been held on Saturday 11 July which had been attended by Councillors Angell, Birch, Brossard, Dudley, Finnie, Hill, Mrs Ingham, Mrs Mattick, Mrs McKenzie, Mrs McKenzie-Boyle, Ms Peacey, Mrs Phillips, Thompson and Turrell.

 

The Committee noted:

 

  • The supplementary report of the Head of Planning tabled at the meeting.
  • Winkfield Parish Town Council had recommended refusal due to concerns that the proposal would be an overdevelopment of the site, and were concerned that insufficient parking would be provided. The proposal would set a precedent for this type of application in this area.
  • Six letters of objection had been received from neighbouring residents. The reasons for objection were summarised as follows:

- The erection of a dwelling in this location would result in an adverse impact on the character and appearance of the area, and would be an overdevelopment of the site.

- The dwelling would appear out of keeping with the streetscene and would be a cramped form of development.

- Detrimental impact on neighbouring properties through loss of privacy.

- Highway safety concerns due to additional cars and poor access.

 

RESOLVED that following the completion of planning obligation(s) under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 relating to:-

 

01.       Thames Basin Heath Special Protection Area

 

That the Head of Planning be authorised to APPROVE the application subject to the following condition(s):-

 

01.     The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.   

         

02.     The development hereby permitted shall be carried out only in accordance with the following approved plans received by the Local Planning Authority on 10th April and 3rd June 2015:        

          P14/50/S/101/A   

          P14/50/S/110      

         

03.     The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall be of similar appearance to those of the existing dwelling at No.23 Darwall Drive.      

         

04.     No construction works shall take place until details showing the finished floor levels of the dwelling hereby approved in relation to a fixed datum point have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

         

05.    No development shall be occupied until a means of vehicular access has been constructed in accordance with details which have been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority.

.             

06.    No development shall be occupied until the visibility splays shown to the north east of the access on the approved drawings have been provided.  Those areas shall at all times thereafter be kept free of all obstructions to visibility over a height of 0.6 meters measured from the surface of the adjacent carriageway.

         

07.    No development shall be occupied until a plan showing the visibility splay to the south west of the access has  ...  view the full minutes text for item 29.

30.

Application No 15/00281/FUL - 9 Vickers Row, Bracknell, RG12 9PQ pdf icon PDF 92 KB

Erection of a single storey rear extension and conversion of garage into habitable accommodation.

Minutes:

Erection of a single storey rear extension and conversion of garage into habitable accommodation

 

The Committee noted:

 

  • Bracknell Town Council had recommended that the application be refused as there is a condition on application 03/00567/OUT for the dwelling, which states that all garage accommodation should be retained for the use of parking at all times.
  • 2 letters of objection had been received which can be summarised as follows:

-Size of the extension is not in keeping with the size of the plot.

-Loss of light to their back garden.

-Increased traffic and congestion in this part of Vickers Row during the construction period.  Increased congestion during construction is not a material consideration.

 

RESOLVED that the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

 

01.     The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.   

         

02.     The development hereby permitted shall be carried out only in accordance with the following approved plans:       

          BFC/VR-01 'Block Plan', received on 25 March 2015   

          BFC/VR-02R 'Proposed Ground Floor Plan', received on 02 May 2015          

          BRF/VR-03R 'Proposed Elevations', received on 02 May 2015           

         

03.     Prior to the occupation of the garage conversion hereby approved a roller shutter door shall be inserted to the front of the cycle/storage area.  Any replacement or repair shall only be with a roller shutter type garage door         

04.     The development hereby approved shall not be occupied until details of the associated vehicle parking has been provided in accordance with a scheme to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The spaces shall not thereafter be used for any purpose other than parking.       

 

Councillor Mrs Mattick took part in consideration of this item but did not vote thereon.

31.

PS Application No 15/00312/FUL - Ramslade House, Austin Way, Bracknell pdf icon PDF 204 KB

Erection of 12no. three bedroom houses with associated parking (including 7no. visitor spaces to the south of nos. 11 and 12 Typhoon Close and 1no to south of 10 Tempest Mews), provision of a vehicle turning head on Tempest Mews, landscaping and laying out of commemorative garden, following demolition of Ramslade House.

Minutes:

Erection of 12no. three bedroom houses with associated parking (including 7no. visitor spaces to the south of nos. 11 and 12 Typhoon Close and 1no to south of 10 Tempest Mews), provision of a vehicle turning head on Tempest Mews, landscaping and laying out of commemorative garden, following demolition of Ramslade House.

 

The Committee noted:

 

  • The supplementary report of the Head of Planning tabled at the meeting.
  • Warfield Parish Council did not support the loss of historic buildings which were being rapidly eroded from Bracknell’s history.  Bracknell Town Council had recommended refusal, pointing out that potential buyers of property on the Parks Estate had been told that Ramslade House would be preserved as a community facility.
  • Objections from 25 individuals raising the following concerns:

   Loss of Ramslade House

- there are few old or historic buildings remaining in Bracknell

- Ramslade House is a beautiful old building, with original architecture and features and links to the RAF - the applicant has neglected it: money should have been spent on it instead of public art.

- it should be put to a community or education use

- Ramslade House is a focus for views on the site - only old building in a sea of new

Highways and parking

- the planned parking bays are on land already used by residents and visitors - their use will lead to increased parking on the narrow roads/on bends/on footways which is a safety concern and already an issue

- insufficient parking spaces for residents of new properties

- existing garages in Tempest Mews and Typhoon Close are too small

- loss of proposed disabled spaces

- there are better and fairer parking solutions

- the 7 parking spaces adjacent to no 11/12 Typhoon Close will be used by people visiting the park rather than residents and their visitors

- Tempest Mews is a private road which residents maintain - if residents withdraw consent for access to this road all traffic and parking will focus on Typhoon Close

- children play in Tempest Mews in summer months - their safety will be affected

- no need for the proposed bin store in Tempest Mews - it will increase traffic on a private road: who will pay for damage to the road?

- Tempest Mews cannot accommodate 2 passing vehicles without crossing the frontage owned by residents

- Increased traffic in the estate and local roads to detriment of road safety

Residential amenity/impact on character

-12 properties is excessive - they should have integral garages and driveways as per Tempest Mews

- concerns about health and safety due to proximity of properties, highway and pedestrians

-  loss of sunlight from tall houses

- density and overdevelopment - adverse effect on character of neighbourhood and residential amenity of neighbours

- total footprint substantially greater than current and out of character - will block off views of green space

- disturbance from more cars - more noise, dust and fumes

- proposal would represent overdevelopment

-  ...  view the full minutes text for item 31.

32.

Application No 15/00331/FUL - White Cottage, Devils Highway, Crowthorne, RG45 6SR pdf icon PDF 126 KB

Erection of a new 4 bedroom dwelling house following the demolition of the existing bungalow (part retrospective as bungalow has already been demolished).

Minutes:

Erection of a new 4 bedroom dwelling house following the demolition of the existing bungalow (part retrospective as bungalow has already been demolished)

 

A site visit had been held on Saturday 11 July which had been attended by Councillors Angell, Brossard, Dudley, Finnie, Hill, Mrs Ingham, Mrs Mattick, Mrs McKenzie, Mrs McKenzie-Boyle, Ms Peacey, Mrs Phillips, Thompson and Turrell.

 

The Committee noted:

 

  • The supplementary report of the Head of Planning tabled at the meeting.
  • Crowthorne Parish Council had recommended approval of the application.
  • 2 letters of objection had been received raising the following:

- New dwelling imposing and eyesore

- Out of character with surrounding area and other properties

- New build has destroyed views of woodland from garden of 3 Brookers Corner

- Overlooking

- Overbearing due to size compared to that of former bungalow

- Noise due to construction work including early mornings and weekends

- Is an investment and property will be sold on after built

- Build not approved by LPA but has not delayed construction

- Works are retrospective

- The applicant has undertaken retrospective works on a property in Wokingham without first obtaining planning permission.

- White Cottage appears on historic maps in around 1870 and was second oldest property in Crowthorne. The former property was poorly modernised over recent decades with extensions. Just because of the age of a dwelling, they are not all of substandard construction.

- Replacement dwelling is double the height of original bungalow, is the equivalent of a two storey dwelling at the apex

- White Cottage once had land that extended to Brookers Corner but half of it was sold for construction of a pair of semi-detached properties on Brookers Corner which turned the front garden into a small back garden with the access moved to make the front garden of the site today. The site whilst in a good size plot the area of land which can be built on is restricted by the settlement boundary and SPA.

- Whilst attempts have been made to make the dwelling less imposing, the following are concerns:

- Velux windows result in overlooking

- Side facing window looks into garden

- Dwelling maybe partially well screened but due to shrubs/trees on neighbours land and are deciduous

- Could do planting or erect fence to screen the dwelling

- Single storey element is tall and imposing

- Replacement dwelling will have permitted development rights intact

- Storm drainage ditch runs along settlement boundary and ensures run off from forest does not flood gardens of Brookers Corner, Upper Broadmoor Road and White Cottage itself. Any blockage of the storm drain will cause flooding to surrounding properties

- Object to proposal due to excessive roof height and resultant bulk, detrimental to visual amenities of surrounding area

- Proposal should be considered as additional housing not permissible under SPA legislation.

- Dwelling is incoherent. Dwelling design is more befitting of Edgcumbe Park.

- No valid documentation in relation to  ...  view the full minutes text for item 32.

33.

Application No 15/00416/T - Locks Ride Playing Fields, Forest Road, Winkfield Row, Bracknell pdf icon PDF 98 KB

Temporary siting of a mobile catering unit.

Minutes:

Temporary siting of a mobile catering unit

 

The Committee noted:

 

  • Winkfield Parish Council had made the application and therefore they had not commented on it.
  • 2 letters of objection had been received raising the following:

   - Impact on character of area

- Cause traffic congestion and parking issues

- Object to any cooking which would generate smells (eg. onions/burgers/hot dogs) especially as the proposal is for 7 days a week from 9am to 6pm

- Increase in rubbish may lead to increase in rats, etc

- There are barbecues already on site

- Increase in noise

- No need for a monstrosity

 

RESOLVED that the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

 

01.     The catering unit should trade from site from the time of granting planning permission until 30 September 2015 and thereafter be removed from site and be brought back onto site and commence trading again from 1 May 2016 until 30 September 2016 from where it shall be removed and the land restored to its former condition on or before 30 September 2016.

         

02.     The development hereby permitted shall be carried out only in accordance with the approved plans/photographs received by the Local Planning Authority on 15 May 2015.            

         

03.    Notwithstanding the details submitted, the catering unit shall not be brought onto the site until details of the catering unit including its measurements and siting have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The catering unit shall be sited on the land in accordance with the approved details.

 

Councillors Mrs Hayes and Mrs Phillips, having declared an interest in this item withdrew from the meeting and took no part in the consideration of it.  Councillor Ms Gaw had left the meeting prior to consideration of this item.

34.

Application No 15/00436/3 - Street Record, Pendlebury, Bracknell pdf icon PDF 81 KB

Convert grass amenity area into 3 parking spaces.

Minutes:

Convert grass amenity area into 3 parking spaces

 

The Committee noted:

 

·         Bracknell Town Council had raised no objection to the proposed development.

·         No neighbour objections had been received.

 

RESOLVED that the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

 

01.     The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.   

         

02.     The development hereby permitted shall be carried out only in accordance with the following approved plans received by the Local Planning Authority on 15th May 2015:      

          4817 80 - Pendlebury     

         

03.     The development shall not be begun until a scheme depicting hard and soft landscaping, including the provision of knee-rail fencing and the proposed maximum heights of planting, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The scheme shall include a 3 year post planting maintenance schedule.

         

All planting comprised in the soft landscaping works shall be carried out and completed in full accordance with the approved scheme, in the nearest planting season (1st October to 31st March inclusive) to the completion of the development or prior to the occupation of any part of the approved development, whichever is sooner. All hard landscaping works shall be carried and completed prior to the occupation of any part of the approved development. As a minimum, the quality of all hard and soft landscape works shall be carried out in accordance with British Standard 4428:1989 'Code Of Practice For General Landscape Operations' or any subsequent revision. All trees and other plants included within the approved details shall be healthy, well-formed specimens of a minimum quality that is compatible with British Standard 3936:1992 (Part 1) 'Specifications For Trees & Shrubs' and British Standard 4043 (where applicable) or any subsequent revision.  Any trees or other plants which within a period of 5 years from the completion of the development, die, are removed, uprooted, are significantly damaged, become diseased or deformed, shall be replaced during the nearest planting season (1st October to 31st March inclusive) with others of the same size, species and quality as approved.

35.

Application No 15/00455/NMA - 2 Grove Farm Cottages, Lower Sandhurst Road, Sandhurst, GU47 8JG pdf icon PDF 79 KB

Non material amendment to planning permission 14/00917/FUL for larger roof lanterns and additional first floor window to rear.

Minutes:

Non-material amendment to planning permission 14/00917/FUL for larger roof lanterns and additional first floor window to rear.

 

The Committee noted:

 

  • The occupiers of the adjoining property have objected on the following grounds:

- Works have not been undertaken in accordance with the approved planning permission

- Materials are inappropriate and out of keeping with the character of the cottages

- Size and scale of roof lanterns has detrimental impact on area

- Impact to privacy - clear line of sight from the bedroom window of no. 1 Grove Farm Cottage into both the orangery and kitchen areas of No.2 and vice versa through overlooking.

- Appear that the intent was always to build the apertures at this size and scale given the continuation of the roof build despite the intervention of the Council.

- The scale of the works are overbearing

- First floor window would impact privacy of rear garden of no. 1.

- The submitted drawings show different detail for the porch arrangement, than is currently approved but the revised planning application makes no mention of this.  Th roof overhang is greater in depth in the now 'as-built status' than detailed on the drawings and as such increases the bulk nature of the new build as viewed from both the highway, and No.1 Grove Farm Cottage. 

- Works have not been monitored by the Council

- Window at first floor level in the rear forming part of the NMA has now been installed.

- Is in line of sight from kitchen to window of no. 1

- As built revisions are unacceptable

- Overbearing

- Intrusive

- Out of character with surrounding buildings and environment

- Overlooking and loss of privacy

- No other buildings in immediate area which have UPVC

- Conditions imposed should be monitored

- Installation of flue - should be removed

- Conditions imposed trees should be protected and no bonfires lit

 

A motion was moved and seconded, to approve the non-material amendment, as recommended in the officer report.  An amendment was moved and seconded that an additional condition be imposed to the effect that obscure glazing be installed on the eastern side of the roof lantern over the orangery.  Having been put to the vote, the amendment was carried.  The substantive motion was then put and carried.

 

RESOLVED that the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:

 

01.     Non-Material Amendment 15/00455/NMA relates only to the following approved plans received by the Local Planning Authority on 1 May 2015:           

drawing no. PUL/15/02 

 

02.     Within 1 month of the date of this permission being granted, the eastern elevation of the roof lantern located closest to the rear elevation of the original dwelling shall be glazed with a minimum of Pilkington Level 3 obscure glass (or equivalent). It shall be retained as such thereafter.

36.

Application No 15/00542/RTD - Telecommunications Mast, Waterside House, Longshot Lane, Bracknell pdf icon PDF 125 KB

Removal of existing 14.7 metre high Phase 3 monopole mast and the installation of a 15 metre high Phase 5 monopole and Samoa cabinet.

Minutes:

Removal of existing 14.7 metre high Phase 3 monopole mast and the installation of a 15 metre high Phase 5 monopole and Samoa cabinet.

 

The Committee noted:

 

·         No objection from Binfield Parish Council.

·         No neighbour objections had been received.

 

RESOLVED that the siting and appearance of the development proposed be APPROVED in accordance with the plans as stated below:-

 

01.     Drawing entitled site location received by Local Planning Authority on 10 June 2015  

          Drawing entitled site layout received by Local Planning Authority on 10 June 2015     

          Drawing entitled equipment layout received by Local Planning Authority on 10 June 2015     

          Drawing entitled site elevation received by Local Planning Authority on 10 June 2015            

          Drawing entitled antenna details received by Local Planning Authority on 10 June 2015

 

02.     The existing 14.7m high mast shall immediately be removed following the installation of the replacement mast hereby permitted once it is operational.

 

Contact Information

Democratic services

Email: committee@bracknell-forest.gov.uk